Most don’t last long enough to provide habitat for many forest species
(ST. LOUIS): Secondary forests, or forests that have regrown after agriculture use, only last an average of 20 years, according to a recently released scientific paper [open access].
The finding presents a major problem for large-scale restoration policy, which often focuses on commitments to restore a certain number of hectares by a given year. But the benefits of restoration depend on those forests persisting. It takes much longer than 20 years for a secondary forest to absorb large amounts of carbon, or to provide habitat for many forest species, research shows.
The paper, The ephemerality of secondary forests in southern Costa Rica, is one of the first studies to look at how long secondary forests persist.
“This work is important because all of our hopes and needs for tropical secondary forests rely on those forests recovering for long periods of time,” said Missouri Botanical Garden Scientist Leighton Reid, who was the lead author of the paper. “Species conservation, carbon storage, and other benefits require forests to grow old, and in southern Costa Rica, they aren’t.”
Reid and his collaborators used aerial photos of secondary forests in Costa Rica from 1947 to 2014 for their research. Using those photos, they found that secondary forests grew for an average of only 20 years before they were converted to another land use, typically agriculture. A total of 85 percent of secondary forests were re-cleared before reaching the age of 54, the study found.
Riparian forests and larger forest fragments had lower risks of reforestation than other secondary forests, research showed.
Reid said he hopes this study will lead to stronger restoration commitments.
“Currently, countries are making large-scale commitments with no long-term vision. There is a great opportunity for an ambitious, progressive country to commit to restore a million hectares of 100-year old forest by 2120, instead of a million hectares of zero-year old forest by 2020,” he said.
The study focused on Costa Rica because data was available at a high resolution over a long period of time. It was also an interesting case study because of its Payments for Ecosystem Services program and because it is among the countries that made a major restoration commitment under the Bonn Challenge.
The research has the longest time scale, 67 years, and the greatest special resolution, 10 meter resolution, of any studies that have looked at secondary tropical forest persistence. Two previous studies only went back as far as 1985 and used lower resolution data.
More Intense, More Frequent, and Longer Lasting Heat Waves in the 21st Century.
Gerald A. Meehl and Claudia Tebaldi.
Science, 13 AUGUST 2004
“All organisms live within a limited range of body temperatures …. Direct effects of climatic warming can be understood through fatal decrements in an organism’s performance in growth, reproduction, foraging, immune competence, behaviors and competitiveness.”
Hans O. Pörtner and Anthony P. Farrell. Physiology and Climate Change.
SCIENCE 31 OCTOBER 2008 VOL 322
“Observed heat wave intensities in the current decade are larger than worst-case projections.”
Auroop R. Gangulya, et al. Higher trends but larger uncertainty and geographic variability in 21st century temperature and heat waves.
PNAS, September 15, 2009.
“ … organisms have a physiological response to temperature, and these responses have important consequences …. biological rates and times (e.g., growth, reproduction, mortality and activity) vary with temperature.”
Anthony I. Dell, Samraat Pawar and Van M. Savage, Temperature dependence of trophic interactions are driven by asymmetry of species responses and foraging strategy.
Journal of Animal Ecology 2013
“What can be said with some assurance is that there is a unique and nearly ubiquitous compound, with the empirical formula H(2960)O(1480)C(1480)N
(16)P(1.8)S, called living matter. Its synthesis, on an oxidized and uncarboxylated earth, is the most intricate feat of chemical engineering ever performed – and the most delicate operation that people have ever tampered with.”
Edward S. Deevey, Jr. Mineral Cycles.
Scientific American, September 1970.